| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
FlintC
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 10:30AM Post subject: more progress |
|
|
final pix to come within a week or so, getting close to done. amps will be mounted permanently sometime tomorrow.
Headunit: Alpine CDA-9887, running active
Amps: 2 x Cadence TXA-600.4 (150x4 @ 4 ohm for mids/tweets, 600x2 @ 4 for subs)
Midwoofers: 2 x Mach 5 MLI-65
Tweeters: 2 x Seas Neo 27TFFNC/G
Subs: 2 x Dayton RS HO 10's
Deadening: eDead V1SEČ
Enclosure: .7 net per sub @ 30hz using 3" aero ports
the victim...
well its not the prettiest thing in the world, first time ever building a box on my own, in the past ive always had the help of my buddy who does carpentry for a living, so anyways, dont flame me too bad for my woodworking skills. as u can see, the carpet i got obviously didnt work too well, i can make carpet look pretty good for what its worth, not pro by any means, but typically a hella lot better than this came out. maybe ill re wrap it someday. anyways, hears the pix, im about to headout and try to get the rest of this thing complete
|
|
| Back to top |
|
trialsindude
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 1217
Location: white marsh, balti co, MD
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 2:56PM Post subject: |
|
|
| box is good but i would have done sub up ports back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
nauticac
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 1141
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 3:04PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Everything looks good so far but you should have mounted your high's up near the a-pillars for optimum sound. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ryomanmkiii
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 34
Location: Central Alabama
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 3:05PM Post subject: |
|
|
Guy, no points taken off for DIY action! You think that looks back bad? Wait till you see what I'm about to post.
Hey. I'm feeling those foglights. You have a post about them I can read? |
|
| Back to top |
|
FlintC
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 3:05PM Post subject: |
|
|
| why? it sounds great like it is... plus it wouldnt work with mounting the amps and all, i tried everything, i got it down to lookin pretty decent id say... sounds hella good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
FlintC
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 3:11PM Post subject: |
|
|
nauticac wrote: Everything looks good so far but you should have mounted your high's up near the a-pillars for optimum sound.
thats not true, not entirely by any means, down in the kicks they sound real nice, in fact, once i can get them on axis it will be a lot better. the main problem people have with having them down low is stage height, with a lil t/a i got mine up to the center of the dash right about where the top of the radio door is.. its where it sounds best to me right now... its only been installed a few days, so ill get it good b4 long, especially once i get the tweets on axis, or a lot closer |
|
| Back to top |
|
nauticac
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 1141
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 3:21PM Post subject: |
|
|
| As long as everything sounds good to you that's all that matters. I was referring to sound staging when I made that comment. I've just always heard people say to mount tweets up high but as long as everything still sounds nice, rock on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
FlintC
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 3:24PM Post subject: |
|
|
| yea ur right, most people do, alot of people dont have the EQ and t/a capabilities on their units though, actually, even down there, i still have them attenuated slightly, i have the mids 80 - 2.5k/12db and the tweets at 2.5k+/24db. :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
nebster
Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Posts: 7754
Location: team SOLO
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 3:35PM Post subject: |
|
|
| with only your 9887 for sound processing do you have any idea of going with the imprint or the h701 |
|
| Back to top |
|
FlintC
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 4:07PM Post subject: |
|
|
| imprinting this week, we will see how i like it, from there i may go h701/c701 combo |
|
| Back to top |
|
nebster
Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Posts: 7754
Location: team SOLO
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 4:18PM Post subject: |
|
|
| you wont need the c701 with the 9887, it is compatable with the h701 but if you need a c701 i have one for sale |
|
| Back to top |
|
Tcguy85
Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 2440
Location: Hyde Park, NY
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 4:32PM Post subject: |
|
|
| lookin good dude! |
|
| Back to top |
|
scionsareok
Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 5:48PM Post subject: |
|
|
| Damn those are some thin ports. And .7 ft^3 per sub? My 10" has I believe 2.75 for it haha |
|
| Back to top |
|
trialsindude
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 1217
Location: white marsh, balti co, MD
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 6:08PM Post subject: |
|
|
scionsareok wrote: Damn those are some thin ports. And .7 ft^3 per sub? My 10" has I believe 2.75 for it haha
Well your "10inch" has enough space for some 15s...
:no: |
|
| Back to top |
|
Tcguy85
Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 2440
Location: Hyde Park, NY
|
| Posted: 9/1/08 7:00PM Post subject: |
|
|
scionsareok wrote: Damn those are some thin ports. And .7 ft^3 per sub? My 10" has I believe 2.75 for it haha
yup, the dayton ho's work best in very small ported enclosures and somehow still get damn low.
they are also pretty efficient but have a lowish xmax so they don't need a huge port.
very kick butt subs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
scionsareok
Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: 9/2/08 3:00PM Post subject: |
|
|
trialsindude wrote: scionsareok wrote: Damn those are some thin ports. And .7 ft^3 per sub? My 10" has I believe 2.75 for it haha
Well your "10inch" has enough space for some 15s...
:no:
Maybe some 15's, but not the same sub in 15"..
And thats tight tcguy85 I wish my sub hit lows a little better |
|
| Back to top |
|
Tcguy85
Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 2440
Location: Hyde Park, NY
|
| Posted: 9/2/08 5:04PM Post subject: |
|
|
scionsareok wrote: trialsindude wrote: scionsareok wrote: Damn those are some thin ports. And .7 ft^3 per sub? My 10" has I believe 2.75 for it haha
Well your "10inch" has enough space for some 15s...
:no:
Maybe some 15's, but not the same sub in 15"..
And thats tight tcguy85 I wish my sub hit lows a little better
whats frequency is your box tuned to? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |